Paternity Actions vs APR Cases
The main difference between paternity actions and APR cases lies in the focus. A paternity action aims to determine the biological father, while APR cases involve two individuals who acknowledge they are the child’s parents and need the court’s assistance in deciding parental responsibilities.
For instance, an APR case will focus on the best interests of the child and include decisions on parenting time, decision-making authority, and child support. However, unlike paternity cases, retroactive child support is typically limited to the date of the petition’s filing in APR cases.
When To Seek An APR Cases
If the parentage of the child is clear and both parents agree on this, but parental roles and responsibilities need clarification, an APR case is likely appropriate. Courts in APR cases prioritize the child’s welfare and aim to establish a balanced, beneficial arrangement for parenting responsibilities.
Why Timeliness Matters
In both paternity and APR cases, acting promptly is crucial. For instance, delaying a paternity action may impact potential child support retroactively, affecting financial security for the child. Similarly, in APR cases, early involvement ensures that both parents’ roles are legally defined, protecting each party’s rights and responsibilities.